Humana has lost a second lawsuit aiming to challenge the star ratings in Medicare Advantage (MA).
The insurer, which has the bulk of its insurance business in MA, initially lost a legal fight contesting its scores in mid-July, with a Texas judge arguing that the company had not yet exhausted the administrative appeals process before suing. Humana filed a second lawsuit later in the month, which was rejected by the Texas courts on Tuesday.
Humana charges that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) deemed three test phone calls as poor, which led to a significant drop in their scores. Star ratings scores are critical in determining quality bonus payments made to Medicare Advantage insurers.
In the ruling, Judge Reed O'Connor determined that the feds' determinations on those calls were not "arbitrary and capricious" and that a no-callbacks policy did not violate federal law.
"The agency’s determination is in accordance with its guidelines and is not arbitrary or capricious," O'Connor said.
Shares in Humana were down by about 3.5% as of midafternoon on Tuesday. An analysis from Capstone notes that the loss means Humana will likely lose out on a $3 billion windfall from its scores increasing for plan year 2025.
Humana said in a statement to Fierce Healthcare that it "will consider all available legal options to ensure the Star Ratings calculated by CMS are accurate, consistent and representative of plan quality."
Payers have had mixed success in challenging the star ratings, with Humana's two legal fights as notable losses. However, industry leader UnitedHealthcare did win a lawsuit that led to its scores being recalculated, as did Alignment Healthcare.
Florida Blue, meanwhile, did not see success in challenging the feds over the star ratings.